Jobs / Economy

Refinery Closures Lead to Rising Gas Prices and Job Losses

by Robert Rapier

Refinery Closures and the Keystone Pipeline

There have been several announcements in recent months of refinery closures that will likely impact gasoline supplies (and prices) on the East Coast. Some of those closures have been on the East Coast. Others — such as the Hovensa refinery in the Virgin Islands and some European refineries — supply product to the East Coast.

So why are these refineries closing?

Basically, despite the very popular image of perpetually fat profits for the oil companies, the refining business has been historically poor. If a refinery often operates in the low single digit rates of return — or as has frequently been the case, loses money — oil companies will eventually shut them down. Even if other parts of the business are making money, they won’t keep finding a money loser.

But why do refineries struggle with profitability?

In recent years, demand for gasoline has been down due to high prices in the U.S. As oil prices have climbed, refiners have struggled to pass on all of the increased costs of those higher oil prices to consumers. They would like to sell gasoline for a bit more, but the reduced demand keeps their margins low for the most part. Ultimately some are forced to shut down. That will also mean higher gasoline prices for consumers:

No relief in rising gasoline prices as refineries shut down

“On January 18, Hess announced the closure of its HOVENSA joint venture refinery in the U.S. Virgin Islands, a major source of product supply to the East Coast,” the Energy Department said. “That planned closure follows on the heels of the idling of two refineries in the Delaware Valley by Sunoco and ConocoPhillips and announced plans by Sunoco to idle another refinery in the region by mid-2012.” The Energy Department added, “The complete idling of the three refineries would collectively cut as much as 50% of current East Coast refining capacity.”

Operating a Refinery Requires Manpower and Creates Jobs

In addition to higher prices, the closures mean loss of jobs in a very tough economy. As I pointed out recently in What’s So Bad About Exporting Gasoline?, one way to keep those refineries going is something that some have complained about, and that is for refiners to export finished products. It should be clear by now that these refiners must find additional markets (or cheaper oil) if they are to survive.

These thoughts were rattling around in my head the past few days, and just today crystallized into this post. One of the things I have been thinking about are the implications if the Keystone Pipeline is or isn’t built. I have explained my views on the pipeline in a series of recent posts, so I won’t rehash them here. But basically, I have tried to sort out the most likely implications in either case. If the pipeline isn’t built, will it slow down the development of the oil sands in Canada? Will that oil continue to get to market, but in environmentally riskier ways (like trucking or rail). Will it cause Canada to more aggressively seek other markets for their oil? Probably:

With oil pipeline to US on hold, Canada eyes China

Prime Minister Stephen Harper says Canada’s national interest makes the $5.5 billion pipeline essential. He was “profoundly disappointed” that U.S. President Barack Obama rejected the Texas Keystone XL option but also spoke of the need to diversify Canada’s oil industry. Ninety-seven percent of Canadian oil exports now go to the U.S. “I think what’s happened around the Keystone is a wake-up call, the degree to which we are dependent or possibly held hostage to decisions in the United States, and especially decisions that may be made for very bad political reasons,” he told Canadian TV.

The article notes that pipelines are rarely rejected in Canada, but Keystone opponents are counting on that oil not being able to reach the Pacific Coast for export to China. After all, if it does then they will have made matters worse by blocking the route into the U.S. and forcing the oil to travel a further distance to market.

The Keystone Pipeline is of course really about climate change. Opponents want to stop the expansion of the oil sands, and so they have thrown several wedge arguments out there in order to reach their ultimate goal.

Conclusion: Exporting a Product is Good for Business*

One of the wedge arguments is about job creation. Proponents have made certain claims (in many cases inflated) about the number of jobs that will be created. Opponents counter that there won’t be that many jobs created, and besides some of the oil is going to be exported.

That may be the wrong way to look at it. If you see what is happening with the refinery closures, what a pipeline to the U.S. Gulf Coast may do is keep some of the refineries there in business. Imagine if these East Coast refineries — which don’t have easy access to affordable oil — were at the end of the Keystone Pipeline. They might have managed to stay in business. Sure, they might export some of the gasoline and jet fuel. So what? Will the product simply not exist on the open market if those refineries didn’t make it? Not likely; it would just be refined by someone else.

So we may look back in a few years — as we are closing down Gulf Coast refineries because their major source of oil is ever more expensive crude from the Middle East and Venezuela — and realize that those jobs could have been saved if only they had better access to a friendly, stable supply of oil. So what if we import Canadian oil and export gasoline? In an oil crisis, we won’t export the gasoline. We will use it right here at home. That is, if the refineries actually have access to the crude.

* Incidentally, now that the ethanol subsidy has expired, I feel the same way about exporting ethanol. If that’s what it takes for them to stay in business, as long as they aren’t exporting taxpayer subsidized product then more power to them.

Read more: http://www.consumerenergyreport.com/2012/01/31/refinery-closures-lead-to-rising-gas-prices-and-job-losses/

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 389 other followers

RSS FT Commodities News

RSS Consumer Energy Alliance

  • CEA Warns Against Costly Fuel Program in Oregon
    CEA Warns Against Costly Fuel Program in Oregon  WASHINGTON – At Governor Kitzhaber’s direction, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality has issued a draft rule for beginning implementation of a state low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) program, calling it a “Clean Fuels Program.” The program closely mirrors other LCFS proposals that have been studi […]
  • CEA Welcomes Inquiry of Five-Year Offshore Development Plan and Future Needs
    CEA Welcomes Inquiry of Five-Year Offshore Development Plan and Future Needs CEA supports congressional efforts to understand future impacts of Obama Administration’s draft five year plan HOUSTON, TX: Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA) strongly supports today’s House Committee on Natural Resources’s hearing highlighting the Obama Administration’s draft fiv […]
  • May 2012 Newsletter
    May 2012 CEA Newsletter Issue 62 Practical Policies and Sensible Solutions Recently, Consumer Energy Alliance has been hard at work, educating consumers and policymakers of the importance of our national energy policy and urging voters and candidates alike to prioritize energy as part of the debate leading up to the elections in November.  And, we’ve been th […]
  • CEA Urges Interior to Not List Dunes Sagebrush Lizard
    CEA Urges Interior to Not List Dunes Sagebrush Lizard: CEA Submits Over 13,000 Comments Highlighting Concern for Energy Development HOUSTON, TX: Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA) submitted over 13,000 public comments on Friday from its U.S. consumer-advocates to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that urge the agency not to list the dunes sagebrush lizard as ei […]
  • Consumer Energy Alliance Welcomes Keystone XL Permit, Pledges Support
    HOUSTON, TX- Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA) applauds TransCanada’s re-submission of its presidential permit application for the Keystone XL pipeline.  The action is a critical step for a project that is integral in securing reliable energy supplies for the benefit of the U.S. economy, consumers and our nation’s energy security, while providing thousands of j […]
  • Hurdles to Offshore Energy Remain
    As tens of thousands of energy professionals descend upon Houston this week for the 2012 Offshore Technology Conference, we are reminded just how far technology has come in such a short time.  In the two years since the Deepwater Horizon tragedy, both the private sector and federal regulators have advanced new technologies and practices that [...]
  • Consumer Energy Alliance Welcomes Newest Affiliate Member, Mississippi Energy Institute
  • CEA Commends New Hampshire Senate Passage of HB 1487
    CEA Commends New Hampshire Senate Passage of HB 1487 Bill will prohibit funding for costly low carbon fuel standards without legislative due process WASHINGTON – Earlier today, the New Hampshire Senate passed HB 1487, an act that will prohibit the State from funding participation in any national, state or regional low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) withou […]
  • Consumer Energy Alliance Welcomes Newest Affiliate Member, Chemistry Industry Council of Illinois
  • The uncertain state of regulation
    The uncertain state of regulation Last week, we learned about plans for a new set of regulations covering natural gas production from hydraulic fracturing. And this week, the Interior Department has said that those forthcoming rules are still being defined and it’s unclear when they will be released. If it sounds familiar, that’s because it is. The [...]

RSS Free Enterprise

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS ANGA.US

RSS Energy Tomorrow

RSS NYT – El Paso

  • Korean Oil Firm Is Part of Group Buying El Paso Assets
    A South Korean state-run oil company, the Korean National Oil Corporation, is a part of the group that includes Apollo Global Management, Riverstone Holdings and Access Industries.
  • How Wall Street Deals With Conflicts
    There are no options to police conflicts among investment bankers as there are in the law. Indeed, conflicts of interest appear to be almost a cost of doing business on Wall Street these days.
  • DEALBOOK; El Paso Shareholders Approve Kinder Morgan Deal
    Shareholders of the natural gas pipeline operator El Paso Corporation overwhelmingly approve takeover bid by Kinder Morgan, originally valued at $21.1 billion.
  • A Mirror Can Be a Dangerous Tool for Some C.E.O.'s
    Being a visionary leader, or at least thinking you are, can propel corporate chieftains to great heights, but it can also lead to extreme narcissism. And the victims are often shareholders.
  • El Paso Corp. Chief Defends His Actions in Kinder Morgan Deal
    In a letter to employees, Douglas L. Foshee said he acted properly in negotiating the sale of the El Paso Corporation to Kinder Morgan, despite criticism from a Delaware judge.
  • DEALBOOK; As an Adviser, Goldman Sachs Guaranteed Its Payday
    Andrew Ross Sorkin DealBook column discusses recent revelations that Goldman Sachs, in an advisory role in Kinder Morgan's deal for El Paso, was on every conceivable side of the negotiations, and El Paso may have unwittingly sold itself for far too cheap a price; holds Goldman's brazenness in the deal is nothing short of breathtaking, and is just a […]
  • DealBook Online
    DealBook Online; bill in Congress might give companies caught in government investigations a mechanism to recover some payments if a former officer or director is found to have violated the law; Mike Stewart, JPMorgan Chase head of proprietary trading, is leaving to start his own hedge fund; El Paso Corp pushes back shareholders vote on company's planne […]
  • As an Adviser, Goldman Guaranteed Its Payday
    In an advisory role in a deal for the El Paso Corporation, Goldman Sachs was on every conceivable side of the negotiations, and El Paso may have unwittingly sold itself at far too cheap a price.
  • El Paso Delays Vote on Kinder Morgan Deal by a Few Days
    The El Paso Corporation said it pushed back the meeting by a few days, to allow shareholders to weigh a Delaware judge's criticism of the process that led to the company's $21.1 billion sale to Kinder Morgan.
  • The Losers in the El Paso Corp. Opinion
    While its liability exposure is limited, the El Paso Corporation's investment bank, Goldman Sachs, sustains another blow to its reputation, argues the Deal Professor.
Watch videos at Vodpod.

Twitter Updates

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 389 other followers